Effectiveness of chemical peeling in the treatment of cutaneous hyperpigmentation in patients treated at an aesthetic clinic in Asunción, Paraguay
Keywords:
Chemical peel, hyperpigmentation, melasma, aesthetic dermatology, skin treatmentAbstract
Introduction: Cutaneous hyperpigmentation is one of the most common concerns in dermatology and aesthetic medicine, significantly affecting patients’ quality of life. Chemical peels are widely used as a therapeutic option; however, their effectiveness may vary depending on the type of pigmentary disorder.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of chemical peeling in the treatment of cutaneous hyperpigmentation in patients treated at a private aesthetic clinic.
Materials and Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study with a prospective component, conducted in 30 patients with hyperpigmentation treated with chemical peels during 2024. Sociodemographic variables, type of hyperpigmentation, degree of clinical improvement, and adverse effects were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: A total of 70% of patients achieved excellent or good clinical improvement. Melasma was the most frequent condition (50%) and showed the best therapeutic response. Adverse effects were mild and transient, with dryness (33%) and erythema (27%) being the most common. No severe complications were reported.
Conclusion: Chemical peeling is an effective and safe intervention for the treatment of cutaneous hyperpigmentation, particularly in melasma, with a favorable safety profile.
Downloads
References
1. Fabbrocini G, De Vita V, Pastore F, et al. Chemical peels: mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(1):e14746. doi:10.1111/dth.14746
2. Sarkar R, Arora P, Garg KV. Chemical peels for melasma in dark-skinned patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2012;78(5):552–560. doi:10.4103/0378-6323.100571
3. Gupta AK, Gover MD, Nouri K, Taylor S. The treatment of melasma: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(6):1048–1065. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.02.009
4. Rendon MI, Gaviria JI. Review of chemical peels in melasma. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2005;8(7):42–47
5. Monheit GD, Chastain MA. Chemical peeling: indications, efficacy, and complications. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30(1):62–68. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.08.021
6. Grimes PE. Melasma: etiologic and therapeutic considerations. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(12):1453–1457. doi:10.1001/archderm.1995.01690240089014
7. Kligman DE, Kligman AM. Solar lentigines. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988;19(4):593–601. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(88)70238-0
8. Hexsel D, Dal’Forno T, Hexsel C. Cellulite and cosmetic dermatology correlations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(5):523–528. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.03015.x
9. Kang HY, Valerio L, Bahadoran P, et al. The role of melanocytes in hyperpigmentation. Pigment Cell Res. 2009;22(4):512–523. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0749.2009.00574.x
10. Draelos ZD. Skin lightening preparations and treatments. Dermatol Clin. 2007;25(3):407–412. doi:10.1016/j.det.2007.04.001
11. Taylor SC, Torok H, Jones T, et al. Efficacy and safety of hydroquinone. Cutis. 2003;72(1):67–72
12. Nanda S, Bansal S. Chemical peeling: current concepts. Indian J Dermatol. 2010;55(2):195–202. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.62751
13. Khunger N. Complications of chemical peels. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2008;1(1):19–23. doi:10.4103/0974-2077.41159
14. Bae-Harboe YS, Graber EM. Easy as PIE: a review of chemical peels. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(10):1610–1623. doi:10.1111/dsu.12293
15. Soleymani T, Lanoue J, Rahman Z. A practical approach to chemical peels. Clin Dermatol. 2018;36(1):101–110. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2017.09.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rosa María Acosta Rizzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo el contenido de esta revista, está bajo 