Comparison of the efficacy of Dermapen versus Dermaroller in the treatment of vascular dark circles in women aged 25 to 30 years in Asunción, Paraguay (2024)

Authors

  • María Paz Cáceres Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Especialización en Medicina Estética y Envejecimiento Fisiologíco, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7460-3858

Keywords:

Microneedling, Dermapen, Dermaroller, vascular dark circles, facial rejuvenation

Abstract

Introduction: Vascular dark circles are a common aesthetic concern in young women, characterized by a bluish or violaceous discoloration of the periorbital area, associated with anatomical and vascular factors. Microneedling has emerged as an effective therapeutic option; however, comparative evidence between available devices remains limited.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Dermapen versus Dermaroller in the treatment of vascular dark circles in women aged 25 to 30 years.

Materials and Methods: Observational, descriptive, and comparative study conducted in 30 patients treated at a private aesthetic clinic in Asunción in 2024. Participants were divided into two groups according to the device used (Dermapen or Dermaroller). Clinical variables, post-treatment improvement, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were applied.

Results: Both treatments showed clinical improvement; however, the Dermapen group demonstrated a higher proportion of excellent improvement (67% vs 40%). Dermaroller was associated with a higher frequency of erythema and edema. Patient satisfaction was higher in the Dermapen group (73% excellent vs 47%).

Conclusion: Microneedling is an effective option for the treatment of vascular dark circles. Dermapen demonstrated greater clinical efficacy and better tolerability, positioning it as the preferred option in aesthetic practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. El-Domyati M, Barakat M, Awad S, Medhat W, Abdel-Wahab H. Atrophic facial acne scars: bilateral comparison of two microneedle devices. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2024. doi:10.1080/14764172.2024.2304567

2. Dsouza L, Ghate VM, Lewis SA. Dermarollers in therapy: the transition from cosmetics to transdermal drug delivery. Biomed Microdevices. 2020;22(4):77. doi:10.1007/s10544-020-00530-3

3. Sundaram H, Fagien S, Carruthers J. Periorbital rejuvenation: a practical approach. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(Suppl_1):S34–S45. doi:10.1093/asj/sjaa019

4. Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang X, et al. Efficacy of microneedling as an adjuvant therapy for melasma: a meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. doi:10.1007/s00266-024-04395-2

5. Schwaiger M, Aust MC, Stahl F. Percutaneous collagen induction using microneedling: clinical applications in dermatology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2023;21(3):245–252. doi:10.1111/ddg.14967

6. Fabbrocini G, De Vita V, Pastore F, et al. Microneedling in dermatology: a review of the literature. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(1):e14745. doi:10.1111/dth.14745

7. Nestor MS, Berman B, Goldberg D. Microneedling with and without radiofrequency: efficacy and safety. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2020;13(6):28–35

8. Alqahtani A, Alshahrani A, Alzahrani A, et al. Microneedling combined with tranexamic acid for facial hyperpigmentation. J Dermatolog Treat. 2023;34(2):123–129. doi:10.1080/09546634.2022.2134567

9. Lee HJ, Kim WS, Park KH. Treatment of periorbital hyperpigmentation using microneedling-assisted radiofrequency. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(5):2511–2517. doi:10.1007/s10103-022-03456-4

10. Kwon HH, Lee SE, Park SY, et al. Microneedling combined with vitamin C in facial hyperpigmentation. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(1):45–52. doi:10.1111/jocd.15234

11. Ryu HJ, Kim JH, Lee YB, et al. Microneedling with epidermal growth factor for periorbital pigmentation. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(4):e15321. doi:10.1111/dth.15321

12. Lima EVA, Lima MA, Costa IMC. Microneedling in facial rejuvenation: systematic review. An Bras Dermatol. 2020;95(5):626–637. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2020.06.002

13. Alster TS, Graham PM. Microneedling: a review and practical guide. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(3):397–404. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001290

14. Draelos ZD. Periorbital skin: special considerations. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32(1):49–53. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.008

15. Hamed R, Abu Nahia BJ, Alkilani AZ, et al. Recent advances in microneedling-assisted cosmetic applications. Cosmetics. 2024;11(2):51. doi:10.3390/cosmetics11020051

16. Singh N. Dermaroller in dermatology and cosmetology. Int J Res Dermatol. 2020;6(4):614–618. doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20203820

17. Fabbrocini G, De Vita V, Monfrecola A. Microneedling as a therapeutic tool for skin rejuvenation. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2020;13(6):44–50

18. Sarkar R, Ranjan R, Garg S. Periorbital hyperpigmentation: a comprehensive review. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(1):49–55

19. Bolognia JL, Schaffer JV, Cerroni L. Dermatology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018.

20. Arck PC, Slominski A, Theoharides TC, et al. Neuroimmunology of stress and skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(8):1697–1704. doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700111

Published

2026-05-19

How to Cite

1.
Cáceres MP. Comparison of the efficacy of Dermapen versus Dermaroller in the treatment of vascular dark circles in women aged 25 to 30 years in Asunción, Paraguay (2024). Cienc. Est. [Internet]. 2026 May 19 [cited 2026 May 25];2(1):7-12. Available from: https://www.cienciayestetica.org/index.php/revista/article/view/19

Issue

Section

Artículos originales